Corporate boards are imposing pay limits on their own compensation
Main Data Group’s new director pay limits data
Main Data Group’s new director pay limits data
Board members set their own compensation—an awkward but largely unavoidable fact of corporate protocol. To defuse accusations of self-dealing, corporate directors have relied in large part on surveys and the advice of independent consultants to determine their pay. Because the size of executive compensation dwarfs it, by comparison, board compensation has seldom been subjected to public criticism, the severest of which has targeted practices rather than dollar amounts (e.g., eligibility for defined-benefit retirement plans, the granting of stock options, etc.).
But as the size of directors’ compensation packages has incrementally grown over time and some high-profile lawsuits have emerged, governance watchdogs have begun to focus on the magnitude of pay. Consequently, corporate boards are increasingly establishing pay boundaries and communicating these limits in proxy statement disclosures. This trend constitutes an important new set of data points to supplement traditional benchmarks for director pay. Keeping abreast of these new self-imposed restrictions will be crucial for boards to ensure that they remain within evolving competitive norms.
The boundaries come in various forms, depending on several factors.
The Main Data Group (MDG) director pay limits analysis is a new data component of our standard board pay details report. For each peer, it shows all the applicable limits, including information from boards that have adopted multiple limits. The data categories are:
MDG’s new director pay limits analysis is only one of several steps we are taking to expand our coverage of board compensation and ensures that we remain in the vanguard of evolving issues.
Glean insights into director pay and how the board operates and more with this our board pay module.